The analytical approach is familiar, powerful, and compelling, but not all
scientific understanding builds upon discrete elemental units and their com
binatorics. The question this essay addresses is whether the analytical app
roach is appropriate for the study of human culture. Does culture have clea
rly identifiable, distributionally stable parts sufficient to justify the p
articulate mode of understanding? Is culture comprised of elemental units,
or is it merely convenient to think of it this way? The essay suggests that
the quest for natural units of culture is a doomed undertaking. There will
be no periodic chart for culture grounded in stable, essential properties,
whether at the level of culture traits and complexes or at the cognitive l
evel of ideas and schemata. On the other hand, various methods of data elic
itation can produce replicable and superficially discrete results, which gi
ves some hope for the possibility of a methodological particularism. (Units
of culture, cultural boundaries, traits, methodological particularism).