Irritable bowel syndrome: is the search for lactose intolerance justified?

Objectives To determine if confirmation of hypolactasia offers any benefit to the dietary treatment of patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Methods One hundred and twenty-two consecutive IBS patients (37 male, 85 fe male) were given lactose hydrogen breath tests (LHBT). Those with positive LHBT followed a low lactose diet for 3 weeks. Those improving on the diet w ere given double-blind, placebo-controlled challenges (DBPCC) with 5 g, 10 g and 15 g of lactose and a placebo, to confirm lactose intolerance. Those who did not respond to the low lactose diet followed either an exclusion or low fibre diet. Symptoms scores were kept prior to the LHBT, 8 h post-LHBT and daily whilst following any dietary change. Patients with negative LHBT returned to clinic and subsequent dietary interventions were recorded. Results LHBT was positive in 33/122 (27%) IBS patients. Symptom scores prio r to LHBT were not significantly different between the two groups, but afte r LHBT the symptoms in the positive group were significantly worse. Twenty- three patients followed a low-lactose diet of which only nine (39%) improve d. Six who did not improve followed an exclusion diet, three improved and a ll were intolerant of milk. Three tried a low fibre diet with two improving . DBPCC were inconclusive. In the negative LHBT group 35 agreed to try a di et and 24 improved (69%). Eight were intolerant of cow's milk. Conclusions Use of a low lactose diet was disappointing in IBS patients wit h lactose malabsorption. Food intolerance was demonstrated in IBS patients with positive or negative LHBT and milk was identified as a problem in both groups. DBPCC were inconclusive. There appears to be little advantage in t rying to separate patients who malabsorb lactose from others with IBS. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 13:219-225 (C) 2001 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.