Developing evaluation capacity while improving evaluation training in public health: the American Cancer Society's Collaborative Evaluation Fellows Project
D. Compton et al., Developing evaluation capacity while improving evaluation training in public health: the American Cancer Society's Collaborative Evaluation Fellows Project, EVAL PROG P, 24(1), 2001, pp. 33-40
The Collaborative Evaluation Fellows Project (CEFP) is a nationally adminis
tered model for the development of program evaluation capacity. It is innov
ative in that it requires collaboration between the American Cancer Society
, Inc. (ACS) offices and faculty and students from local universities, One
purpose of the project is to establish stronger links between the ACS and u
niversity-based professional training in program evaluation, primarily in s
chools of public health. Graduate students are selected according to unifor
m criteria to become CEFP evaluation fellows for 1 year. In the role of eva
luation fellows, they design and carry out an actual program evaluation of
an agreed-upon ACS program under faculty supervision using the utilization-
focused model. During the first 3 years of the five-year grant-funded proje
ct, the ACS's National Home Office and all 17 ACS regional offices (divisio
ns) have developed partnerships and gained experience in using program eval
uation data for program improvement and decision-making purposes. In additi
on, 97 students have gained practical, real-world cancer-focused program ev
aluation experience. It is anticipated that through the CEFP, program evalu
ation will be demystified for ACS staff and lead to the hiring of professio
nals to conduct evaluations of older, new, and modified programs in communi
ty cancer control. It is also anticipated that participating schools of pub
lic health will enhance their program evaluation courses, especially with a
topical focus on community cancer control. In these ways, it is hoped the
CEFP will have an impact on a national voluntary health agency, on schools
of public health and on cancer control, on how public health professionals
are trained, and on others who might adapt and adopt the model. (C) 2001 El
sevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.