Transpapillary intraductal US prior to biliary drainage in the assessment of longitudinal spread of extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma

Citation
K. Tamada et al., Transpapillary intraductal US prior to biliary drainage in the assessment of longitudinal spread of extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma, GASTROIN EN, 53(3), 2001, pp. 300-307
Citations number
35
Categorie Soggetti
Gastroenerology and Hepatology
Journal title
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY
ISSN journal
00165107 → ACNP
Volume
53
Issue
3
Year of publication
2001
Pages
300 - 307
Database
ISI
SICI code
0016-5107(200103)53:3<300:TIUPTB>2.0.ZU;2-V
Abstract
Background: The utility of intraductal US via the transpapillary route prio r to biliary drainage in the assessment of longitudinal extension of extrah epatic bile duct carcinoma was investigated. Methods: In 19 patients with extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma who underwent surgical resection, an ultrasonic probe (diameter, 2.0 mm; frequency, 20 M Hz) was inserted into the bile duct via the transpapillary route prior to b iliary drainage. Longitudinal cancer extension along the bile duct was pros pectively determined and compared with the histologic findings in the resec ted specimens. Results: Results on the hepatic side were as follows: Intraductal US demons trated more extensive longitudinal cancer spread than cholangiography in 9 of 19 patients with one instance of overdiagnosis. The accuracy of intraduc tal US in assessing the extent of spread (84%) was superior to that of chol angiography (47%) (p < 0.05), Results on the duodenal side were as follows: In patients with suprapancreatic bile duct cancer (n = 14), intraductal US demonstrated more extensive longitudinal cancer spread than cholangiograph y in 8 of 14 patients. The accuracy of intraductal US in assessing the exte nt of the spread (86%) was superior to that of cholangiography (43%) (p < 0 .05). Conclusions: Transpapillary intraductal US prior to biliary drainage is use ful in demonstrating longitudinal extension of bile duct cancer. However, t he surgical margins were inaccurate in some patients.