Constant estrogen, intermittent progestogen vs. continuous combined hormone replacement therapy: tolerability and effect on vasomotor symptoms

Citation
S. Rozenberg et al., Constant estrogen, intermittent progestogen vs. continuous combined hormone replacement therapy: tolerability and effect on vasomotor symptoms, INT J GYN O, 72(3), 2001, pp. 235-243
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Medicine
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS
ISSN journal
00207292 → ACNP
Volume
72
Issue
3
Year of publication
2001
Pages
235 - 243
Database
ISI
SICI code
0020-7292(200103)72:3<235:CEIPVC>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
Objective: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of a novel oral constan t estrogen plus intermittent progestogen hormone replacement therapy (HRT) regimen to a continuous combined HRT regimen in postmenopausal women. Metho ds: Subjects were randomly assigned to receive treatment with either consta nt 17 beta -estradiol (E-2), 1 mg, plus intermittent norgestimate (NGM) 90 mug (3 days off, 3 days on) (n = 221) or E-2 2 mg/norethisterone acetate (N ETA) 1 mg (II = 217) for i year. Treatments were evaluated based on the inc idence of hot flushes and uterine bleeding. Results: Both regimens had simi lar bleeding profiles and provided comparable vasomotor symptom relief. How ever, breast discomfort and edema were experienced by twice as many subject s who received E-2/NETA. Conclusions: The constant E-2/intermittent NGM reg imen was well tolerated and possesses similar efficacy compared with a cont inuous combined E-2/NETA regimen and may be considered whenever HRT without withdrawal bleeding is deemed appropriate. (C) 2001 International Federati on of Gynecology and Obstetrics. All rights reserved.