Updated results of the phase III Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) trial 85-31 evaluating the potential benefit of androgen suppression following standard radiation therapy for unfavorable prognosis carcinoma of the prostate
Ca. Lawton et al., Updated results of the phase III Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) trial 85-31 evaluating the potential benefit of androgen suppression following standard radiation therapy for unfavorable prognosis carcinoma of the prostate, INT J RAD O, 49(4), 2001, pp. 937-946
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS
Purpose: To determine the potential advantage of androgen ablation followin
g standard external-beam radiation therapy in patients with locally advance
d (clinical or pathologic T3; clinical or pathologic node positive) carcino
ma of the prostate,
Methods and Materials: In 1987 the RTOG initiated a Phase III trial of long
-term adjuvant goserelin in definitively irradiated patients with carcinoma
of the prostate. A total of 977 patients were accrued to the study of whic
h 945 remain analyzable: 477 on the adjuvant hormone arm (Arm I); and 468 o
n the radiation only arm (Arm II) with hormones initiated at relapse. The i
nitial results were reported in the Journal of Clinical Oncology in 1997,
Results: With a median follow up of 5.6 years for all patients and 6.0 year
s for living patients local failure at 8 years was 23% for Arm I and 37% fo
r Arm II (p < 0.0001). Distant metastasis was likewise favorably impacted w
ith the immediate use of hormonal manipulation with a distant metastasis ra
te in Arm I of 27% and 37% in Arm II (p < 0.0001), Disease-free survival (N
ED survival) and NED survival with PSA of 1.5 ng/mL (bNED) or less were bot
h statistically significant in favor of the immediate hormone arm (both p <
0.0001). Cause-specific failure was not statistically different with a cau
se-specific failure of 16% for Arm I and 21% in Arm II (p = 0.23), Overall
survival was likewise not statistically different between two arms, with a
49% overall survival at 8 years in Arm I and 47% in Arm II (p = 0.36). Subs
et analysis of centrally reviewed Gleason 8-10 patients who did not undergo
prostatectomy showed that for patients receiving radiation therapy plus ad
juvant hormones there was a statistically significant improvement in both a
bsolute (p = 0.036) and cause-specific survival (p = 0.019),
Conclusions: Use of long-term adjuvant androgen deprivation in addition to
definitive radiation therapy results in a highly significant improvement in
regards to local control, freedom from distant metastasis, and biochemical
free survival in unfavorable prognosis patients with carcinoma of the pros
tate. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Inc.