Investigating the effect of seasonal plant growth and development in three-dimensional atmospheric simulations. Part I: Simulation of surface fluxes over the growing season
Ea. Tsvetsinskaya et al., Investigating the effect of seasonal plant growth and development in three-dimensional atmospheric simulations. Part I: Simulation of surface fluxes over the growing season, J CLIMATE, 14(5), 2001, pp. 692-709
The authors examine the effect of seasonal crop development and growth on t
he warm- season mesoscale heat, moisture, and momentum fluxes over the cent
ral Great Plains region of North America. The effect of crop growth and dev
elopment on the atmospheric boundary layer is addressed in a follow- up pap
er (Part II). Energy, moisture, and momentum fluxes are studied over a maiz
e agroecosystem at the scale of a 90- km atmospheric grid cell. Daily plant
development and growth functions incorporated into the surface flux calcul
ations are based on a physiological crop growth model CERES- Maize version
3.0. CERES- Maize simulates daily plant growth and development as a functio
n of both environmental conditions (temperature, precipitation, solar radia
tion, and soil moisture) and plant- specific genetic parameters. Plant grow
th and development functions from CERES were incorporated into the Biospher
e- Atmosphere Transfer Scheme (BATS), and selected crop parameters [i. e.,
Leaf Area Index (LAI) and crop height] were validated against field data. T
he sensitivity of sensible (H) and latent (LE) heat fluxes, and momentum fl
ux (tau) to interactively simulated LAI and canopy height was quantified.
During the extremely dry season of 1988, 20%- 35% changes in sensible heat
and 30%- 45% changes in latent heat occurred in response to LAI changes fro
m 5 to 1 (the values simulated in the control and interactive experiments,
respectively). These changes are statistically significant (at the 0.05 lev
el) for all the locations and years under consideration. Relative contribut
ions of evaporation and transpiration to the latent heat flux were also str
ongly affected by these LAI changes. This effect had a distinct diurnal pat
tern, with the strongest signal seen in midafternoon hours, and was more pr
onounced during the dry years (e. g., 1988 and 1989) compared to the favora
bly moist years (e. g., 1991, 1993).