In 3 experiments, the authors investigated and described how individuals co
ntrol manual interceptive movements to slowly moving targets. Participants
(N = 8 in each experiment) used a computer mouse and a graphics tablet asse
mbly to manually intercept targets moving across a computer screen toward a
marked target zone. They moved the cursor so that it would arrive in the t
arget zone simultaneously with the target. In Experiment 1, there was a ran
ge of target velocities, including some very slow targets. In Experiment 2,
there were 2 movement distance conditions. Participants moved the cursor e
ither the same distance as the target or twice as far. For both experiments
, hand speed was found to be related to target speed, even for the very slo
wly moving targets and when the target-to-cursor distance ratios were alter
ed, suggesting that participants may have used a strategy similar to tracki
ng. To test that notion, in Experiment 3, the authors added a tracking task
in which the participants tracked the target cursor into the target zone.
Longer time was spent planning the interception movements; however, there w
as a longer lime in deceleration for the tracking movements, suggesting tha
t more visually guided trajectory updates were made in that condition. Thus
, although participants scaled their interception movements to the cursor s
peed, they were using a different strategy than they used in tracking. It i
s proposed that during target interception, anticipatory mechanisms are use
d rather than the visual feedback mechanism used when tracking and when poi
nting to stationary targets.