Intra- and inter-examiner reproducibility in keratinized tissue width assessment with 3 methods for mucogingival junction determination

Citation
P. Guglielmoni et al., Intra- and inter-examiner reproducibility in keratinized tissue width assessment with 3 methods for mucogingival junction determination, J PERIODONT, 72(2), 2001, pp. 134-139
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Dentistry/Oral Surgery & Medicine","da verificare
Journal title
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY
ISSN journal
00223492 → ACNP
Volume
72
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
134 - 139
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-3492(200102)72:2<134:IAIRIK>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
Background: Although the need for "adequate" amount of keratinized tissue ( KT) for periodontal health is questionable, the mucogingival junction (MGJ) often serves as a measurement landmark in periodontal evaluations, Limited information is available on the reproducibility of KT width (KTW) assessme nt. The purpose of this study was to assess intra- and inter-examiner repro ducibility in measuring KTW by using 3 different methods to identify MGJ lo cation. Methods: Fifteen patients provided 17 teeth which had undergone a gingival augmentation procedure (connective tissue graft; surgery group) and an equa l number of contralateral, non-treated teeth (control group). At the midbuc cal aspect of each tooth, KTW was assessed by 2 independent examiners after MGJ identification by the visual (VM), functional (FM), and visual with hi stochemical staining (HM) method. Data analysis was based on intra-class co rrelation coefficients (ICC) and 3-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for dif ferences between replicate measurements. Results: KTW was significantly different between treated and control teeth. No significant differences in KTW were found in relation to method for MGJ determination and examiner. Intra- and inter-examiner reproducibility was high, regardless of treatment status or method for MGJ determination (ICC = 0.92 - 0.99). Standard deviations of the difference between replicate meas urements ranged from 0.46 mm for VM to 0.21 mm for HM. Conclusions: Intra- and inter-examiner reproducibility has been shown to be substantially consistent when different methods for MGJ determination are used to measure the apico-coronal dimension of the gingiva, The level of re producibility does not seem to be affected whether or not the mucogingival complex has been surgically altered by a gingival augmentation procedure.