Acellular dermal matrix allografts to achieve increased attached gingiva. Part 1. A clinical study

Citation
Pc. Wei et al., Acellular dermal matrix allografts to achieve increased attached gingiva. Part 1. A clinical study, J PERIODONT, 71(8), 2000, pp. 1297-1305
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Dentistry/Oral Surgery & Medicine","da verificare
Journal title
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY
ISSN journal
00223492 → ACNP
Volume
71
Issue
8
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1297 - 1305
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-3492(200008)71:8<1297:ADMATA>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
Background: Freeze-dried acellular dermal matrix (ADM) allograft, originall y used for full-thickness burn wounds, was recently introduced as an altern ative to the autogenous free gingival graft (FGG) in achieving increased at tached keratinized tissue. The aim of part 1 of this study was to investiga te the clinical efficacy of the ADM allograft for this particular purpose. Methods: Twelve patients, 7 males and 5 females, with attached gingiva less than or equal to1 mm on the facial aspect of mandibular anterior teeth dem onstrating a tendency of progressive marginal tissue recession, were random ly assigned to either test or control treatment. Six patients received ADM graft (test) and 6 patients received an autogenous FGG harvested from the h ard palate (control). Clinical variables including plaque index (PI), gingi val index (GI), probing depth (PD), attached tissue width (AT), and gingiva l recession (GR) were recorded immediately before surgery and at the 6-mont h postoperative visit. Patients were seen at 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 weeks to mo nitor wound healing and oral hygiene performance (PI and GI). Graft width w as also measured, in corono-apical direction, on individually involved teet h during the surgery. Results: When values between baseline and 6 months were compared in both gr oups, there was no statistically significant difference in changes of PI, G I, PD, and GR (P >0.05) with the exception of PD in the FGG group (1.01 +/- 0.03 versus 1.27 +/- 0.20 mm, P = 0.042). There was a statistically signif icant (P <0.05) increase in AT in both groups. Although the ADM group recei ved wider grafts than the FGG group (8.81 +/- 0.46 versus 6.70 +/- 0.89 mm) , the AT gain was significantly smaller (2.59 +/- 0.92 versus 5.57 +/- 0.44 mm) and the graft shrinkage significantly greater (71 +/- 10% versus 16 +/ - 12%) in the ADM group than in the FGG group (P <0.01). Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that in procedures aiming at increasing the width of attached gingiva: 1) the ADM allograft was less ef fective and less predictable than the autogenous FGG in terms of increasing attached keratinized tissue due to considerable shrinkage and inconsistent quality of the attached tissue gained and 2) the esthetic results using th e ADM allograft might be better than those using the autogenous FGG.