D. De Leonardis et Ge. Pecora, Prospective study on the augmentation of the maxillary sinus with calcium sulfate: Histological results, J PERIODONT, 71(6), 2000, pp. 940-947
Background: The main goal of the sinus elevation procedure is the formation
of vital bone to allow the tissue integration of endosseous implants to su
pport prosthetic restorations in the edentulous posterior maxilla. The idea
l graft material is yet to be found. The present study investigated the his
tologic results of a sinus augmentation procedure performed with calcium su
lfate as the grafting material.
Methods: The clinical trial consisted of 2 groups: a first (control) group
of 12 patients (15 sinuses) in which the material was carefully placed but
not stratified. In the second (test) group, 45 patients (50 sinuses) were t
reated by modifying the application. The calcium sulfate was putty-like in
consistency and placed as it hardened in layers, avoiding fluid contaminati
on. The histologic samples were collected, either at 9 months, at the uncov
ering procedure (for implants placed simultaneously with grafting material)
, or at 6 months at the time of implant insertion (for implants placed at a
later stage).
Results: The augmentation procedure resulted in good, new tissue formation
within the sinuses when clinically and radiographically evaluated. The tech
nique used in the test group produced a reduction in the graft shrinkage du
ring healing, therefore slowing down the material resorption rate. Histolog
ically, new bone formation with progressive lamellar maturation was found i
n both groups. Some particles produced by calcium sulfate resorption were s
till present after 6 months in the test group specimens, but no longer dete
ctable after 9 months. Samples from the control group showed a mean histomo
rphometric bone density of 34.25% +/- 10.02, while samples from the test gr
oup showed a mean value of 55.54% +/- 19.82.
Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that calcium sulfate appear
s to be an effective material for sinus augmentation, yielding vital bone s
uitable for implant integration. In addition, the technique used in the tes
t group seemed to improve the quality and quantity of bone formation.