H. Ikeda et al., Ultrastructural and immunoelectron microscopic studies of the peri-implantepithelium-implant (Ti-6Al-4V) interface of rat maxilla, J PERIODONT, 71(6), 2000, pp. 961-973
Background: The role played by the internal basal lamina (IBL) and hemidesm
osomes between an implant and the periimplant epithelium (PIE) in the adher
ence of the epithelium to the implant is controversial. This study used rat
maxilla implantation models to clarify the ultrastructure of the PIE-impla
nt interface.
Methods: Ti-6Al-4V implants were inserted either immediately or 2 weeks aft
er the extraction of the upper left first molar of 6- or 4-week-old rats, r
espectively. The junctional epithelium (JE) of the upper right molars in th
e same animals was used as a control. Four weeks after implantation, the an
imals were sacrificed to prepare specimens for light and immunoelectron mic
roscopy.
Results: Under light microscopy, the PIE appeared to attach to the implant
surface. Ultrastructurally, IBL, consisting of the lamina densa and lamina
lucida, and hemidesmosomes were formed only in the lower region, and rarely
in the middle region, of the PIE-implant interface. In control teeth, the
IBL and hemidesmosomes formed throughout the dento-JE interface. Laminin-1
was found in the IBL and also in the vesicles and vacuoles of the PIE and J
E cells. Statistical analysis showed that there was also a significant diff
erence in the amount of IBL between the PIE-implant and dento-JE interfaces
.
Conclusions: PIE attached to the implant via hemidesmosomes and IBL in the
lower region of the PIE-implant interface. Although PIE cells may secrete l
aminin-1, which contributes to epidermal cell adhesion, the PIE which attac
hes to implants only in the lower region of the interface is considered to
be the poorly adhered epithelium.