Porous bovine bone mineral in healing of human extraction sockets. part 1:Histomorphometric evaluations at 9 months

Citation
Z. Artzi et al., Porous bovine bone mineral in healing of human extraction sockets. part 1:Histomorphometric evaluations at 9 months, J PERIODONT, 71(6), 2000, pp. 1015-1023
Citations number
66
Categorie Soggetti
Dentistry/Oral Surgery & Medicine","da verificare
Journal title
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY
ISSN journal
00223492 → ACNP
Volume
71
Issue
6
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1015 - 1023
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-3492(200006)71:6<1015:PBBMIH>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
Background: Extraction socket wound healing is characterized by resorption of the alveolar bone at the extraction site. This produces a decrease in ri dge volume, deformations of ridge contours, and, thus, difficulties in dela yed placement of root-form implants in an ideal position. Cancellous porous bovine bone mineral (PBBM) applied to fresh extraction sockets has recentl y been proposed to minimize the reduction in ridge volume. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of PBBM grafted particles on the his topathologic pattern of the intrasocket regenerated bone and to evaluate hi stomorphometrically the healed PBBM grafted extraction socket site at 9 mon ths' post-extraction. Methods: PBBM particles (250 to 1,000 mu in size) were grafted in 15 fresh human extraction sockets in 15 patients. Socket wall bone height was measur ed from the crestal ridge level before the mineral particles were inserted. Primary soft tissue closure was performed to protect the grafted particles via a pediculated split palatal flap. At 9 months, socket bone walls were remeasured and cylinder bone samples of the previously PBBM-grafted sites w ere obtained. Decalcified specimens were sectioned at a cross-horizontal pl ane and stained with hematoxylin and eosin for histopathologic and histomor phologic examination. Tissue area percentage of bone, PBBM, and connective tissue (CT) was calculated for each specimen from the crestal to the apical region and changes in values compared. Results: Average clinical overall bone fill of the augmented socket sites w as 82.3%. Histologically, PBBM particles were observed in all specimens. Ne wly formed bone was characterized by abundance of cellular woven-type bone in the coronal area, while lamellar arrangements could be identified only i n the more apical region. New osseous tissue adhered to the PBBM. Histomorp hometric measurements showed an increase of mean bone tissue area along the histological sections from 15.9% in the coronal part to 63.9% apically (av erage 46.3%). CT fraction decreased from 52.4% to 9.5% (average 22.9%) from the crestal to the apical region. PBBM area fraction varied from 26.4% to 35.1% (average 30.8%). Statistical analysis of the comparison between areas of bone, CT, and PBBM was performed in different points along the coronal- apical axis. Differences were significant (P < 0.01) at the most crestal, m iddle, and apical section cut areas, but not at the cervical section cuts. Bone area fraction increased in the apical direction as much as CT correlat ively decreased. Unlike CT and bone, PBBM retained constant relative volume (approximately 30%), regardless of the depth of the specimen cores. Conclusions: PBBM particles are an appropriate biocompatible bone derivativ e in fresh extraction sockets for ridge preservation. The resorbability of this xenograft could not be recognized in a 9-month period. Further investi gation is needed to clarify the resorptive mechanisms of PBBM.