Qj. Fu et Jj. Galvin, Recognition of spectrally asynchronous speech by normal-hearing listeners and Nucleus-22 cochlear implant users, J ACOUST SO, 109(3), 2001, pp. 1166-1172
This experiment examined the effects of spectral resolution and fine spectr
al structure on recognition of spectrally asynchronous sentences by normal-
hearing and cochlear implant listeners. Sentence recognition was measured i
n six normal-hearing subjects listening to either full-spectrum or noise-ba
nd processors and five Nucleus-22 cochlear implant listeners fitted with 4-
channel continuous interleaved sampling (CIS) processors. For the full-spec
trum processor, the speech signals were divided into either 4 or 16 channel
s. For the noise-band processor, after band-pass filtering into 4 or 16 cha
nnels, the envelope of each channel was extracted and used to modulate nois
e of the same bandwidth as the analysis band, thus eliminating the fine spe
ctral structure: available in the full-spectrum processor. For the 4-channe
l CTS processor, the amplitude envelopes extracted from four bands were tra
nsformed to electric currents by a power function and the resulting electri
c currents were used to modulate pulse trains delivered to four electrode p
airs. For all processors, the output of each channel was time-shifted relat
ive to other channels, varying the channel delay across channels from 0 to
240 ms tin 40-ms steps). Within each delay condition, all channels were des
ynchronized such that the cross-channel delays between adjacent channels we
re maximized, thereby avoiding local pockets of channel synchrony. Results
show no significant difference between the 4- and 16-channel full-spectrum
speech processor for normal-hearing listeners. Recognition scores dropped s
ignificantly only when the maximum delay reached 200 ms for the 4-channel p
rocessor and 240 ms for the 16-channel processor. When fine spectral struct
ures were removed in the noise-band processor, sentence recognition dropped
significantly when the maximum delay was 160 ms for the 16-channel noise-b
and processor and 40 ms for the 4-channel noise-band processor. There was n
o significant difference between implant listeners using the 4-channel CIS
processor and normal-hearing listeners using the 4-channel noise-band proce
ssor. The results imply that when fine spectral structures are not availabl
e, as in the implant listener's case, increased spectral resolution is impo
rtant for overcoming cross-channel asynchrony in speech signals. (C) 2001 A
coustical Society of America.