Polychaetes from the Atlantic seamounts of the southern Azores: biogeographical distribution and reproductive patterns

Citation
P. Gillet et Jc. Dauvin, Polychaetes from the Atlantic seamounts of the southern Azores: biogeographical distribution and reproductive patterns, J MARINE BI, 80(6), 2000, pp. 1019-1029
Citations number
55
Categorie Soggetti
Aquatic Sciences
Journal title
JOURNAL OF THE MARINE BIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED KINGDOM
ISSN journal
00253154 → ACNP
Volume
80
Issue
6
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1019 - 1029
Database
ISI
SICI code
0025-3154(200012)80:6<1019:PFTASO>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
A study of the polychaetes living on isolated seamounts was undertaken to g ive data on marine biogeography and the dispersal of marine invertebrates. The data from the Meteor and Josephine seamounts came from Hartmann-Schrode r and Rosenfeldt's work in the 1980s. Data from Hyeres came from Bellan's w ork in the 1960s, and data from the Atlantis and Hyeres seamounts were obta ined during the Seamount 2 French expedition on board the 'Suroit' in 1993. Thirty-five sites from 280 to 2205 m were sampled: 16 on Atlantis (13 with polychaetes), and 19 on Hyeres (16 with polychaetes). In all 84 polychaete taxa from four seamounts were studied: Atlantis, 36; Hyeres, 33; Josephine , 34; and Meteor 50, but data analysis was based on the following number of taxa: Atlantis, 31; Hyeres, 29; Josephine, 34, and Meteor 48. Two groups o f sites were identified by cluster analysis: I, Atlantis and Hyeres; and II , Josephine and Meteor. Only seven species were present at all sites. Nine families were present only in group I and six other families only in group II. Hesionidae (three species) occurred in group I, conversely Syllidae (16 species) were sampled only in group II. Some of the species were cosmopoli tan (31%), 49% had a large distribution in the Atlantic, 11% were lusitano- mauretanian species, and only 6% were endemic; 51% of the species have dire ct development against 46% of the species which had a planktotrophic develo pment and 3% a lecithotrophic development. Results of the biogeographical d istribution and reproductive patterns of the polychaetes collected on these four sites were compared.