Bone mineral density and histology in distal renal tubular acidosis

Citation
S. Domrongkitchaiporn et al., Bone mineral density and histology in distal renal tubular acidosis, KIDNEY INT, 59(3), 2001, pp. 1086-1093
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology","da verificare
Journal title
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
ISSN journal
00852538 → ACNP
Volume
59
Issue
3
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1086 - 1093
Database
ISI
SICI code
0085-2538(200103)59:3<1086:BMDAHI>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
Background. Chronic metabolic acidosis in distal renal tubular acidosis (RT A) has been implicated in the pathogenesis of enhanced bone resorption and osteopenia, resulting in a loss of bone mineral content. However, histomorp hometric and bone densitometric studies of patients who suffered from longs tanding distal RTA have rarely been done. Methods. A cross-sectional study to determine the alterations of bone miner al density (BMD) and histology was done in 14 nonazotemic RTA patients (11 females and 3 males) who had never received alkaline therapy before enrolli ng into this study. The mean age was 32.7 +/- 11.9 years. BMD measurements and transiliac bone biopsy were done in all patients. Blood chemistries, in tact parathyroid hormone level, and a 24-hour urine collection for the dete rmination of urinary calcium, phosphate, sodium, and potassium were obtaine d from the RTA patients at the time of bone biopsy. Data from 28 age-, sex- , and body mass index-matched, normal controls who were residents in the sa me area were also obtained. Results. Urinary excretion of calcium was 2.05 +/- 1.59 mmol/day. No patien t had hypercalciuria. The serum intact parathyroid hormone level was 15.92 +/- 8.48 pg/mL. RTA patients had lower BMD in most areas when compared with normal controls. There were two patients who suffered from a pathologic fr acture at the femur. Bone histomorphometry from RTA patients shows a signif icantly decreased bone formation rate (0.02 +/- 0.02 vs. 0.07 +/- 0.045 mum (3)/mum(2)/day, P < 0.05), not significantly decreased osteoblastic surface (0.78 +/- 1.03% vs. 2.6 +/- 1.1%) and osteoclastic surface (0.05 +/- 0.03 vs. 0.13 +/- 0.23%), but significantly increased osteoid surface (31.47 +/- 24.52 vs. 5.79 +/- 4.39%, P < 0.05) and osteoid volume (2.95 +/- 3.09 vs. 0.92 +/- 1.05%, P < 0.05) when compared with those of normal controls. Ther e was no difference in osteoid thickness (10.65 +/- 6.10 vs. 8.69 +/- 2.14 <mu>m) Only one distal RTA patient who had a marked increase in osteoid thi ckness justified the diagnosis of osteomalacia. Conclusions. This study demonstrates that low bone mass is common in distal RTA patients. Chronic metabolic acidosis results in suppression of bone fo rmation and resorption, which in turp may contribute to the development of low bone mass in distal RTA patients. Although minor elevations in osteoid surface and osteoid volume are found among distal RTA patients, overt osteo malacia is not the predominant bone lesion.