Effect of fenofibrate on progression of coronary-artery disease in type 2 diabetes: the Diabetes Atherosclerosis Intervention Study, a randomised study
G. Steiner et al., Effect of fenofibrate on progression of coronary-artery disease in type 2 diabetes: the Diabetes Atherosclerosis Intervention Study, a randomised study, LANCET, 357(9260), 2001, pp. 905-910
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Background Atherosclerosis is the most common complication of diabetes. Cor
rection of hyperglycaemia helps to prevent microvascular complications but
has little effect on macrovascular disease. Post-hoc analyses of diabetic s
ubpopulations in lipid intervention trials suggest that correction of lipop
rotein abnormalities will lead to a decrease in coronary-artery disease. Th
e Diabetes Atherosclerosis Intervention Study (DAIS) was specifically desig
ned to assess the effects of correcting lipoprotein abnormalities on corona
ry atherosclerosis in type 2 diabetes.
Methods 731 men and women with type 2 diabetes were screened by metabolic a
nd angiographic criteria. 418 were randomly assigned micronised fenofibrate
(200 mg/day) or placebo for at least 3 years. They were in good glycaemic
control (mean haemoglobin A(10) 7.5%), had mild lipoprotein abnormalities,
typical of type 2 diabetes, and at least one visible coronary lesion. Half
had no previous clinical coronary disease. Initial and final angiograms fol
lowed a standard protocol and were analysed by a computer-assisted quantita
tive approach. Missing data for the primary endpoints (minimum lumen diamet
er, mean segment diameter, and mean percentage stenosis) were imputed. Anal
yses were by intention to treat.
Findings Total plasma cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol. LDL-cholesterol, and tr
iglyceride concentrations all changed significantly more from baseline in t
he fenofibrate group (n=207) than in the placebo group (n=211). The fenofib
rate group showed a significantly smaller increase in percentage diameter s
tenosis than the placebo group (mean 2.11 [SE 0.594] vs 3.65 [0.608]%, p=0.
02), a significantly smaller decrease in minimum lumen diameter (-0.06 [0.0
16] vs -0.10 [0.016] mm, p=0.029), and a non-significantly smaller decrease
in mean segment diameter (-0.06 [0.017] vs -0.08 [0.018] mm, p=0.171). The
trial was not powered to examine clinical endpoints, but there were fewer
in the fenofibrate group than the placebo group (38 vs 50).
Interpretation DAIS suggests that treatment with fenofibrate reduces the an
giographic progression of coronary-artery disease in type 2 diabetes. This
effect is related, at least partly, to the correction of lipoprotein abnorm
alities, even those previously judged not to need treatment.