Background Cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) seems a promising treatment fo
r chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), but the applicability of this treatment o
utside specialised settings has been questioned. We compared CBT with guide
d support groups and the natural course in a randomised trial at three cent
res.
Methods Of 476 patients diagnosed with CFS, 278 were eligible and willing t
o take part. 93 were randomly assigned CBT (administered by 13 therapists r
ecently trained in this technique for CFS), 94 were assigned the support-gr
oup approach, and 91 the control natural course. Multidimensional assessmen
ts were done at baseline, 8 months, and 14 months. The primary outcome vari
ables were fatigue severity (on the checklist individual strength) and func
tional impairment (on the sickness impact profile) at 8 and 14 months. Data
were analysed by intention to treat.
Findings 241 patients had complete data (83 CBT, 80 support groups, 78 natu
ral course) at 8 months. At 14 months CBT was significantly more effective
than both control conditions for fatigue severity (CBT vs support groups 5.
8 [2.2-9.4]; CBT vs natural course 5.6 [2.1-9.0]) and for functional impair
ment (CBT vs support groups 263 [38-488]. CBT vs natural course 222 [3-441]
). Support groups were not more effective for CFS patients than the natural
course. Among the CBT group. clinically significant improvement was seen i
n fatigue severity for 20 of 58 (35%), in Karnofsky performance status for
28 of 57 (49%), and self-rated improvement for 29 of 58 (50%). Prognostic f
actors for outcome after CBT were a higher sense of control predicting more
improvement, and a passive activity pattern and focusing on bodily symptom
s predicting less improvement.
Interpretation CBT was more effective than guided support groups and the na
tural course in a multicentre trial with many therapists. Our study showed
a lower proportion of patients with improvement than CBT trials with a few
highly skilled therapists.