Objective: The p53 status is increasingly regarded as a marker predictive o
f response to particular cancer therapies, but for this approach it is self
-evident that the p53 status must be determined correctly. Methods: We have
tested ovarian cancers with single-strand conformation polymorphism analys
is (SSCP), immunohistochemical staining with DO-1 anti-p53 antibody (IHC),
and yeast p53 functional assay (FASAY). Results: These techniques commonly
used to detect p53 mutations showed important differences in their sensitiv
ity. Of 53 tumors tested with three indirect techniques, 27 (50%), 33 (62%)
and 41 (77%) were positive by SSCP, IHC, and FASAY, respectively. In a sub
set of 32 tumors strongly suspected of containing mutations, 25 (78%), 26 (
81%), 29 (91%) and 30 (94%) were positive by SSCP, immunostaining, DNA sequ
encing and yeast assay, respectively. Conclusions: Under comparable routine
conditions, the FASAY reached the highest sensitivity. Since no single tec
hnique detected all mutations, we recommend the use of at least two differe
nt techniques in situations where the p53 status will affect patient manage
ment. Copyright (C) 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel.