Force and torque effects of a 1.5-Tesla MRI scanner on cardiac pacemakers and ICDs

Citation
R. Luechinger et al., Force and torque effects of a 1.5-Tesla MRI scanner on cardiac pacemakers and ICDs, PACE, 24(2), 2001, pp. 199-205
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Journal title
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY
ISSN journal
01478389 → ACNP
Volume
24
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
199 - 205
Database
ISI
SICI code
0147-8389(200102)24:2<199:FATEOA>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a widely accepted tool for the diagnosi s of a variety of disease states. However, the presence of an implanted pac emaker is considered to be a strict contraindication to MRI in a vast major ity of centers due to safety concerns. In phantom studies, the authors inve stigated the force and torque effects of the static magnetic field of MRI o n pacemakers and ICDs. Thirty-one pacemakers (15 dual chamber and 16 single chamber units) from eight manufacturers and 13 ICDs from four manufacturer s were exposed to the static magnetic field of a 1.5-Tesla MRI scanner. Mag netic force and acceleration measurements rr ere obtained quantitatively, a nd torque measurements were made qualitatively. For pacemakers, the measure d magnetic force was in the range of 0.05-3.60 N. Pacemakers released after 1995 had low magnetic force values as compared to the older devices. For t hese devices, the measured acceleration was even lower than the gravity of the earth (< 9.81 N/kg). Likewise, the torque levels were significantly red uced in newer generation pacemakers (<less than or equal to> 2 from a scale of 6). ICD devices, except for one recent model, showed higher force (1.03 -5.85 N), acceleration 9.5-34.2 N/kg), and torque (5-6 out of 6) levels. II I conclusion, modern pacemakers present no safety risk with respect to magn etic force and torque induced by the static magnetic field of a 1.5-Tesla M RI scanner. However, ICD devices, despite considerable reduction in size an d weight, may still pose problems due to strong magnetic force and torque.