Objective: The purpose of the study was to compare vocational and non-vocat
ional outcomes of clients of two community mental health centers that under
went conversion from day treatment programs to supported employment program
s with outcomes of clients of a center that delayed conversion until after
the study was completed. Methods: As part of a statewide effort in Rhode Is
land to convert day treatment programs to supported employment programs, th
e authors assessed 127 day treatment clients with severe mental illness in
three community mental health centers. Two of the centers converted to supp
orted employment, and one continued its rehabilitative day program. Partici
pants were assessed prospectively for 30 to 36 months, with special attenti
on to vocational and social outcomes. Results: Former day treatment clients
in the converted centers attained higher rates of competitive employment t
han those in the comparison group (44.2 percent and 56.7 percent versus 19.
5 percent). Other employment outcomes also improved, and hospitalization ra
tes and overall social functioning were unchanged. Conclusions: This study
supports findings of previous studies suggesting that replacing rehabilitat
ive day treatment programs with Supported employment programs yields improv
ements in employment outcomes without adverse effects.