G. Leader et D. Barnes-holmes, Establishing fraction-decimal equivalence using a respondent-type trainingprocedure., PSYCHOL REC, 51(1), 2001, pp. 151-165
The purpose of this study was to teach children fraction-decimal equivalenc
e using the respondent-type training procedure and test for any emergent ge
neralization. In the first experiment, subjects were respondently trained o
n the conditional discriminations; A1-->B1, A2-->B2, and tested B1-A1, B2-A
2. Subjects were then trained on the conditional discriminations C1-->B1, C
2-->B2 and tested B1-C1, B2-C2. Subjects were subsequently tested for the e
mergence of the untrained relations A-C and C-A. When subjects were present
ed with the Stimulus Al they observed 1/4 and when subjects were presented
with A2 they observed 2/4. When subjects were presented with B1 they observ
ed a circle with the upper left quarter shaded and when subjects were prese
nted with B2 they observed a circle divided into four quarters with the upp
er half shaded. When subjects were presented with C1 they observed 0.25 and
when subjects were presented with C2 they observed 0.50. Experiment 2 was
identical to Experiment 1 except that subjects were administered three gene
ralization tests. In Generalization Test Number 1, the Stimuli Al, A2, C1,
and C2 served as samples and shapes not seen in training but with the same
shaded areas served as comparison stimuli. Generalization Test No. 2 was id
entical to the previous test, except that the comparison stimuli consisted
of a shape not seen in training and the shaded area was altered. Generaliza
tion Test No. 3 was identical to the previous two tests except that the com
parison stimuli were altered in that the number of shaded and unshaded area
s was increased. Experiment 3 was identical to Experiment 2 except that an
extra generalization test was added to the experiment. This test was identi
cal to Generalization Test No. 3 of Experiment 2, except that the shaded ar
eas were contiguous with each other. In Experiment 1, subjects were success
ful on all equivalence tests. In Experiment 2, subjects were successful on
all equivalence tests and 50% of subjects successfully completed the final
generalization tests. In Experiment 3, subjects were successful on ail equi
valence tests and on all generalization tests.