Dr. Guyer et al., INTERFERON ALFA-2A IS INEFFECTIVE FOR PATIENTS WITH CHOROIDAL NEOVASCULARIZATION SECONDARY TO AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION - RESULTS OFA PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED PLACEBO-CONTROLLED CLINICAL-TRIAL, Archives of ophthalmology, 115(7), 1997, pp. 865-872
Background: Interferon alfa-2a has been shown to be effective as an an
tiangiogenic agent for several systemic human angiogenic disorders and
has shown antiangiogenic activity in the laboratory. Objective: To ev
aluate the safety and efficacy of interferon alfa-2a for the treatment
of choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular dege
neration. Methods: A randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel, multice
nter double-blind trial was performed at 45 ophthalmic centers worldwi
de. Four hundred eighty-one patients were randomly assigned to 4 treat
ment groups: placebo or or interferon alfa-2a (Roferon-A), 1.5, 3.0, o
r 6.0 million international units (MIU). Visual acuity testing, clinic
al examination, fluorescein angiography, and indocyanine green angiogr
aphy were evaluated, with the primary end point being a comparison of
the number of patients who experienced a loss of 3 lines or more of vi
sion at 1 year. Results: At 52 weeks, 40 (38%; 95% confidence interval
, 29%-48%) of 105 placebo-treated patients had lost at least 3 lines o
f vision (with 12% unavailable for follow-up), compared with 142 (50%;
95% confidence interval, 44%-55%) of 286 in che 3 active treatment gr
oups combined. The difference in proportions was not statistically sig
nificant. However, a pairwise comparison of these proportions for the
placebo group vs the group that received interferon alfa-2a, 6 MIU (wi
th 26% unavailable for follow-up), showed a statistically significant
difference in favor of the placebo group (P=.02) and a nearly signific
ant difference for the placebo vs the 1.5-MIU group (P=.05) (with 16%
unavailable for follow-up), again favoring the placebo group. The 3-MI
U group (with 22% unavailable for follow-up) did not show a statistica
lly significant difference in pairwise comparison (P=.48), suggesting
that a dose-response relationship was not evident. Conclusion: Interfe
ron alfa-2a provides no benefit as a treatment for choroidal neovascul
arization secondary to age-related macular degeneration and may be ass
ociated with a poorer visual outcome when given at a dose of 6 MIU. Ho
wever, the absence of a clear dose-response relationship raises the po
ssibility that the observed differences result from chance.