Depression is generally precipitated by stressful life events, which sugges
ts that there could be differences in response to stress in individuals at
risk for depression compared to normal subjects. To test this hypothesis, w
e compared individuals who scored high on ruminative coping, a risk factor
for depression. to individuals low on ruminative coping. We used the Trier
Social Stress Test (TSST), a mock job interview in front of a panel of judg
es, and collected saliva cortisol to assess neuroendocrine response. While
we observed a clear effect of the stressor on saliva cortisol secretion, we
observed no differences in this response between high and low ruminators.
However, the task itself failed to cause a significant increase in ruminati
on in either group. suggesting the task itself may not be optimal for testi
ng the hypothesis. Finally, a modified version of the TSST in which the sub
jects were allowed a longer preparatory period resulted in a markedly dimin
ished saliva cortisol response to the TSST. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd.
All rights reserved.