Objective: Using molecular genetics as the basis for diagnosis, to ass
ess the phenotype in the family originally described as having dominan
tly inherited Dog ne honeycomb retinal dystrophy (DHRD) linked to chro
mosome 2p16. Design: Clinical examination including fluorescein angiog
raphy was undertaken in 107 family members. Nine affected patients und
erwent electroretinography, perimetry, dark adaptometry, color-contras
t sensitivity measurement, and autofluorescent Fundus imaging. Patient
s: The disease-associated haplotype used to allocate disease status wa
s based on our further refinement of the DHRD locus to between loci D2
S2739 and D2S378. The study identified 50 affected patients. In additi
on, previously published information on a further 8 individuals was us
ed. The study population represented 6 generations of a 9-generation p
edigree. Results: Three types of deposits were seen: large, soft druse
n at the macula and abutting the optic nerve head; small, hard deposit
s that in some patients radiated from the macula; and autofluorescent
deposits. Most younger affected individuals exhibited small hard druse
n only at the macula and had normal visual function. Information on 2
patients suggested that DHRD can be a cause of childhood-onset blindne
ss. Advanced disease was associated with severe visual loss and poster
ior pole atrophy without signs of drusen. Advanced age was not invaria
bly associated with severe visual loss. Conclusions: Previously identi
fied characteristics of DHRD were confirmed and new features identifie
d. Contrary to previous reports, the constancy and severity of radial
(basal laminar) drusen seen clinically are the only features that can
be used to differentiate between DHRD and malattia leventinese. The hi
ghly variable phenotype suggests that the influence of the DHRD-mutant
gene mag be modulated by other genetic and/or environmental factors.