This paper considers why organizations use promotions, rather than just mon
etary bonuses, to motivate employees even though this may conflict with eff
icient assignment of employees to jobs. When performance is unverifiable, u
se of promotion reduces the incentive for managers to be affected by influe
nce activities that would blunt the effectiveness of monetary bonuses. When
employees are risk neutral, use of promotion for incentives need not disto
rt assignments. When they are risk averse, it may-sufficient conditions for
this are given. The distortion may be either to promote more employees tha
n is efficient (the Peter Principle effect) or fewer.