Le. Swanson, Rural policy and direct local participation: Democracy, inclusiveness, collective agency, and locality-based policy, RURAL SOCIO, 66(1), 2001, pp. 1-21
During the closing decades of the twentieth century, the federal government
has experienced a period of delegitimation and fiscal crisis that has led
to decentralization of some federal programs and a fledgling revival of com
munity- and place-based policies. These and other locality-based policies a
re not new tools. The renewed interest in this type of policy raises questi
ons about their effectiveness. Historic and recent records of locality-base
d policies suggest that they are not panaceas for achieving programmatic go
als. Three cases provide an empirical, comparative basis for assessing the
liabilities of locality-based policies: the Third New Deal efforts to insti
tute county land-use planning; Mexico's experiences with community forestry
; and emerging grassroots ecosystem management movements in the western Uni
ted States. Among other factors, the degree of local democracy and inclusiv
eness and the quality of local social, economic, and physical infrastructur
es are identified as important in mediating effective policy implementation
.