Objectives Bioassays of rats exposed to acrylonitrile have consistently det
ected an elevated incidence of central nervous system (CNS) cancer. In cont
rast, epidemiologic studies have not found a statistically stable increase
in CNS cancer mortality. The purpose of this paper is to examine whether or
not CNS cancers predicted from the most appropriate inhalation bioassay in
rats are consistent with CNS cancers observed in 3 recent, large epidemiol
ogic studies.
Methods A linearized multistage model was fit to dose-response data from a
rat inhalation bioassay to estimate carcinogenic potency. This potency was
applied to epidemiologic studies of acrylonitrile-exposed workers. After ad
justment for less than complete lifetime follow-up in the epidemiologic stu
dies, consistency was examined between CNS cancers predicted by the model f
it to the animal data for the exposure levels and sample sizes of the epide
miologicy studies and the CNS cancers observed in the epidemiologic studies
.
Results The model predicted totals of 17.7, 3.6, and 7.6 CNS cancer deaths
for the studies. These predictions were not far from the observed CNS cance
r deaths (12, 6, and 6) and were well within their 95% confidence intervals
of 6.9-22.3, 2.2--13.1, and 2.2-13.1, respectively.
Conclusions The CNS cancer potency estimated from the best available inhala
tion bioassay was consistent with the observed deaths in the epidemiologic
studies as long as continuous lifetime exposure was chosen as the exposure
metric. The lack of observed excess in CNS cancer among the studied workers
may have been due to low exposures, insufficient follow-up times, or both.