Peer nomination and peer rating procedures are reviewed with regard to thei
r relevance to assessing children's social acceptance and social status in
school settings. Social acceptance is the child's actual liking by other ch
ildren, whereas social status is the child's comparative social standing or
friendship with classmates. Peer nomination sociometric techniques are mor
e appropriate for measuring social acceptance in children, whereas peer nom
ination techniques are more suited to assessing children's social status. T
he strengths, limitations and potential applications of peer nomination and
peer rating sociometric methods are discussed. A new method of capitalizin
g on the relative strengths of both peer rating and peer nomination procedu
res is presented.