M. Hussong, Protecting the tax-exempt status of housing developers participating in low-income housing tax credit partnerships, WASH LAW RE, 76(1), 2001, pp. 243-277
The Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) is an important source of federal
funding for developers of affordable housing for low-income persons. Altho
ugh for-profit and nonprofit developers compete for credits, the federal go
vernment reserves ten percent of the credits for nonprofit, tax-exempt deve
lopers. Exempt developers often sell the credits to for-profit investors, f
orming a partnership through which the exempt organization develops the hou
sing and the investors receive tax benefits in exchange for capital contrib
utions. The partnership formation, however, may jeopardize the tax-exempt s
tatus of the nonprofit organizations and result in the partnership losing t
he LIHTC. To maintain exempt status, the Internal Revenue Code requires tha
t organizations be organized and operated to promote a charitable purpose a
nd that no net earnings inure to private individuals. A combination of bind
ing and non-binding authority provides confusing guidelines for exempt orga
nizations seeking to protect their exempt status. This Comment examines the
federal requirements for the award of LIHTC and traces the development and
application of a two-prong test used by the Internal Revenue Service to de
termine whether partnership structures jeopardize exempt status. This Comme
nt argues that exempt developers in LIHTC partnerships need binding authori
ty that details the level of control of partnership activities the exempt o
rganization must retain, provides an exception for certain partnership guar
antees by exempt organizations that are standard within the development ind
ustry, and allows investors to receive private benefits to a greater degree
without jeopardizing the organization's exempt status.