We describe 3 elderly patients with acute respiratory failure who received
respiratory assistance with nasal bi-level positive airway pressure (BiPAP)
on the ward. In these patients with poor prognostic factors, non-invasive
positive pressure ventilation was preferred as a reasonable alternative to
invasive ventilation; indeed, their admission to the intensive care unit fo
r mechanical support was considered inappropriate. Despite the small number
of patients and limited experience with the technique, BiPAP is discussed
here as a possible treatment for severe respiratory failure when endotrache
al ventilation is controversial, especially in frail patients 80 years of a
ge or older, because invasive ventilation is associated with high mortality
and morbidity in these patients. Two questions nevertheless need further e
valuation in this setting, and are also addressed. The first is technical:
can transient non-invasive breathing assistance be delivered on the ward? T
he second is ethical: is BiPAP a possible alternative when invasive ventila
tion is considered inappropriate?