A 3-year project compared the operation of a subsurface drip irrigation (SD
I) and a furrow irrigation system in the presence of shallow saline ground
water. We evaluated five types of drip irrigation tubing installed at a dep
th of 0.4 m with lateral spacings of 1.6 and 2 m on 2.4 ha plots of both co
tton and tomato. Approximately 40% of the cotton water requirement and 10%
of the tomato water requirement were obtained from shallow (<2 m) saline (5
dS/m) ground water. Yields of the drip-irrigated cotton improved during th
e 3-year study, while that of the furrow-irrigated cotton remained constant
, Tomato yields were greater under drip than under furrow in both the years
in which tomatoes were grown. Salt accumulation in the soil profile was ma
naged through rainfall and pre-plant irrigation. Both drip tape and hard ho
se drip tubing are suitable for use in our subsurface drip system. Maximum
shallow ground water use for cotton was obtained when the crop was irrigate
d only after a leaf water potential (LWP) of -1.4 MPa was reached. Drip irr
igation was controlled automatically with a maximum application frequency o
f twice daily. Furrow irrigation was controlled by the calendar. Published
by Elsevier Science B.V.