During the World Fair 1900 in Paris an international forest congress took p
lace. In a sensational lecture about the "insufficient commercial timber pr
oduction in the world", the chief of the French forest management A. MELARD
predicted a timber shortage. That caused an intensive discussion in the Ge
rman forest press of 1900 and 1901 between MELARD, the well known German fo
rest professors ENDRES and JENTSCH and the famous English professor SCHLICH
. ENDRES and JENTSCH strictly declined MELARDS theses, pointing to the imme
nse opportunity for importing timber from Russia. SCHLICH supported MELARD'
S explanation about an impending wood shortage and considered ENDRES' calcu
lations to be utopian. Nevertheless all the four opponents demanded a consi
derable increase of timber production in the European industrial countries.
They recommended nearly the same measures, such as reduction of wood consu
mption, improvement of growth by silvicultural methods and afforestation of
bare land.
100 years after that no wood shortage occurred neither in Germany nor in Eu
rope in total. Today, not reduction in wood consumption, but a further incr
ease of wood consumption is the goal of many marketing activities. Wood con
sumption in total and per capita increased considerably. This became possib
le in general due to a distinct increase of removals, not as a result of a
reduction of growing stocks, but as a result of intensified forest manageme
nt activities. Key figures given in table 1 indicate this. A more efficient
use of round wood input as: well as the material recycling are other reaso
ns for today's situation with no wood shortage but a partly unused forest p
roduction potential existing in Europe.