Role of coronary interventional procedures in improved postinfarction survival in the 1990s

Citation
C. Blanton et Pl. Thompson, Role of coronary interventional procedures in improved postinfarction survival in the 1990s, AM J CARD, 87(7), 2001, pp. 832-837
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
ISSN journal
00029149 → ACNP
Volume
87
Issue
7
Year of publication
2001
Pages
832 - 837
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-9149(20010401)87:7<832:ROCIPI>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
The contribution of increased use of some-admission percutaneous coronary i nterventional procedures to recent,improvements in hospital survival of pat ients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains unclear. Patients with International Classification of Diseases codes for AMI (code 410), who wer e admitted to the emergency coronary care unit and underwent an initial epi sode of treatment, were studied over the 9-year period 1990 to 1998 (n = 2, 628). Three triennia between 1990 and 1998 were compared, Trends in risk, t he use of procedures, and hospital outcomes were analyzed. Hospital mortali ty was 33% lower (p <0.02) in the third triennium (5.8%) than in the earlie r 2 triennia (8.7%), equivalent to an absolute reduction of 29 hospital dea ths/1,000 patients treated. The lower hospital mortality was not due to: (1 ) shorter hospital stays (reduction in mortality was primarily in the first 3 hospital days), (2) treatment of lower risk subjects (a risk score based on age, gender, and presence of diabetes increased between the first and t hird triennia), or (3) use of in-hospital interventional procedures (althou gh the use of percutaneous coronary intervention more than doubled in the t hird triennium, most procedures were performed in patients with a 1% risk o f hospital death). We conclude from this study that there has been a substa ntial improvement over a 9-year period in early case fatality after AMI, bu t that this cannot be attributed to the increased use of in-hospital corona ry interventions, which were largely performed on low-risk patients. <(c)> 2001 by Excerpta Medica, Inc.