Some recent astronomical observations [4], and a number of experiments
in particle physics, seem to cast doubt on the validity of the standa
rd linear model for time. These results raise two (at least) questions
: (1) If time is not a linear continuum (i.e., if the standard model i
s incorrect), then why does this model work so well in so many areas o
f science? (2) Whatever the ''true nature'' of time is, are there any
advantages, to science, in replacing the standard model with a more co
mplicated one? The purpose of this paper is to present a non-linear, m
athematical model for time that enables us to answer question (1), and
to partially answer question (2). Our discussion of question (2) is i
ncomplete, but our results are intriguing. They also show promise of h
elping us understand some of the observations mentioned above. A rathe
r natural extension of our model brings it into close contact with one
that has been used in quantum theory (''Stochastically branching spac
etime topology'' by Roy Douglas [2]). These points of contact will als
o be discussed.