Emaf. Hammad et al., Responses of the sweetpotato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci, to the chinaberry tree (Melia azedarach L.) and its extracts, ANN AP BIOL, 137(2), 2000, pp. 79-88
Host preference bioassays for adults of the sweetpotato whitefly were perfo
rmed with leaves of the chinaberry tree Melia azedarach L., tomato, cucumbe
r and bean. Fruit and leaf extracts: of the chinaberry tree were tested aga
inst adults of the sweetpotato whitefly. Fruit extracts were tested against
eggs, first and second instar nymphs, and pupae of the insect. Treatments
included aqueous, methanol, and acetone fruit extracts of 200 mg ml(-1) and
serial dilutions of 20.0 and 2.00 mg ml(-1), ether extract, the botanical
insecticides Azatin(R) and Margosan(R)-O and the control, water or water wi
th Triton(R). Mortality data was collected at 6, 7, and 8 days after treatm
ent of the eggs, nymphs and pupae, respectively. Results of the host prefer
ence bioassays indicated a significantly lower number of live insects on le
aves of the chinaberry tree vs leaves of bean, cucumber, and tomato after 2
4 h. This indicates that M. azedarach is not a good host for the sweetpotat
o whitefly. Adults of the insect were significantly more repelled from toma
to plants treated with the undiluted extracts when compared to the control
after 72 h. There were significant differences in percent mortality of nymp
hal instars when exposed to the undiluted extracts compared to other extrac
ts and the control. However, there was no significant effect of the fruit e
xtracts on the egg and pupa instars. Thus M. azedarach extracts were found
to be repellent to the whitefly adults, while the fruit extracts have shown
a significant detrimental effect against early nymphal instars. In general
, the methanol extracts were more active against B. tabaci than extracts wi
th other solvents.