Randomized prospective controlled trial of recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor as adjunctive therapy for limb-threatening diabetic footinfection

Citation
F. De Lalla et al., Randomized prospective controlled trial of recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor as adjunctive therapy for limb-threatening diabetic footinfection, ANTIM AG CH, 45(4), 2001, pp. 1094-1098
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Microbiology
Journal title
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY
ISSN journal
00664804 → ACNP
Volume
45
Issue
4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1094 - 1098
Database
ISI
SICI code
0066-4804(200104)45:4<1094:RPCTOR>2.0.ZU;2-O
Abstract
Adult diabetic patients admitted to our Diabetes Center from September 1996 to January 1998 for severe, limb-threatening foot infection were consecuti vely enrolled in a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical study aimed at assessing the safety and efficacy of recombinant human granulocyte colo ny-stimulating factor (G-CSF) (lenograstim) as an adjunctive therapy for th e standard treatment of diabetic foot infection. Forty patients, all of who m displayed evidence of osteomyelitis and long-standing ulcer infection, we re randomized 1:1 to receive either conventional treatment (i.e., antimicro bial therapy plus local treatment) or conventional therapy plus 263 mug of G-CSF subcutaneously daily for 21 days, The empiric antibiotic treatment (a combination of ciprofloxacin plus clindamycin) was further adjusted, when necessary, according to the results of cultures and sensitivity testing. Mi crobiologic assessment of foot ulcers was performed by both deep-tissue bio psy and swab cultures, performed at enrollment and on days 7 and 21 thereaf ter, Patients were monitored for 6 months: the major endpoints (i.e., cure, improvement, failure, and amputation) were blindly assessed at weeks 3 and 9. At enrollment, both patient groups were comparable in terms of both dem ographic and clinical data, None of the G-CSF-treated patients experienced either local or systemic adverse effects. At the 3- and 9-week assessments, no significant differences between the two groups could be observed concer ning the number of patients either cured or improved, the number of patient s displaying therapeutic failure, or the species and number of microorganis ms previously yielded from cultures at day 7 and day 21, Conversely, among this small series of patients the cumulative number of amputations observed after 9 weeks of treatment appeared to be lower in the G-CSF arm; in fact, only three patients (15%) in this group had required amputation, whereas n ine patients (45%) in the other group had required amputation (P = 0.038). In conclusion, the administration of G-CSF for 3 weeks as an adjunctive the rapy for limb-threatening diabetic foot infection was associated with a low er rate of amputation within 9 weeks after the commencement of standard tre atment, Further clinical studies aimed at precisely defining the role of th is approach to this serious complication of diabetes mellitus appear to be justified.