Background: Over the past decade, laparoscopy has emerged as a popular meth
od of detecting extrapancreatic metastatic disease in patients presumed to
have localized pancreatic cancer.
Methods and results: The English language literature on laparoscopic stagin
g of pancreatic cancer was reviewed. Interpretation of this literature on s
taging laparoscopy is difficult because (1) there has been inconsistent use
of high-quality computed tomography (CT) in prospective studies, (2) many
studies have included patients with locally advanced disease, and (3) the R
-0/R-1/R-2 resection rates among patients staged by laparoscopy have not be
en reported, making it impossible to correlate laparoscopic findings with t
he R-0 resection rate. Laparoscopy may prevent unnecessary laparotomy in a
proportion of CT-staged patients presumed to have resectable pancreatic can
cer. However, routine laparoscopy is performed on patients judged to have r
esectable disease by high-quality CT, this fraction of patients is between
4 and 13 per cent.
Conclusion: When state-of-the-art CT is available, the routine use of stagi
ng laparoscopy may not be easily justified from the data in the recent lite
rature. Selective use of laparoscopy may be more appropriate and will proba
bly be a more cost-effective staging approach. Criteria are presented for t
he selective use of laparoscopy in the staging of patients with localized p
ancreatic cancer.