Purpose: In the treatment of gastrointestinal malignancies with disseminati
on to peritoneal surfaces the principal advantage of intraperitoneal chemot
herapy over intravenous chemotherapy is the high drug concentration achieve
d locally with low systemic toxicity. This advantage can be optimized by ma
intaining a large area of contact between the chemotherapy solution and the
surfaces within the abdomen and pelvis over a prolonged time period. Using
a rat model we compared the pharmacokinetics of two drugs infused intraper
itoneally, 5-fluorouracil and gemcitabine, in five different carrier soluti
ons. Methods: A total of 120 Sprague Dawley rats were randomized into group
s according to the carrier solution and the drug administered. Rats were gi
ven a single dose of intraperitoneal 5-fluorouracil (20 mg/kg) or gemcitabi
ne (12.5 mg/kg) in 0.1 ml/g body weight of each carrier solution. The carri
er solutions used varied in their tonicity (0.3%, 0.9% or 3% sodium chlorid
e), or were isotonic and varied in molecular weight (0.9% sodium chloride,
4% icodextrin and 6% hetastarch). With the hypotonic, isotonic and hyperton
ic sodium chloride solutions, only 5-fluorouracil was used. Each group was
further randomized according to the intraperitoneal dwell period (1, 3 or 6
h). At the end of the procedure the rats were killed, the peritoneal fluid
was withdrawn completely and the blood was sampled using a standardized pr
otocol. The volume of the peritoneal fluid was recorded, and the drug conce
ntrations in the peritoneal fluid and plasma were determined by high-perfor
mance liquid chromatography. Results: Measurements of peritoneal fluid volu
me showed a more rapid clearance of hypotonic and isotonic sodium chloride
solutions from the peritoneal cavity as compared to hypertonic sodium chlor
ide and high molecular weight solutions. When comparing the remaining intra
peritoneal volumes at 6 h, the differences were statistically significant f
or both 5-fluorouracil and gemcitabine when hetastarch (P<0.0001 and P=0.00
04) and icodextrin (P=0.002 and 0.008) were compared with isotonic sodium c
hloride solution. Similarly, there was a significant difference in the volu
mes recorded at 6 h when hypotonic (P<0.0001) and isotonic sodium chloride
solutions (P=0.0002) were compared with hypertonic sodium chloride solution
. The concentrations of chemotherapy in the different carrier solutions var
ied little. The total amount of drug in the peritoneal cavity decreased wit
h all solutions and more quickly with 5-fluorouracil than with gemcitabine.
There was a significant difference in the total intraperitoneal 5-fluorour
acil between hypotonic and isotonic sodium chloride solutions at 1 h (P = 0
.0003) and 3 h (P = 0.0043), as well as between the isotonic and hypertonic
sodium chloride solutions at 1 h (P = 0.03) and 3 h (P < 0.0001). Similarl
y, there was a significant difference in the total peritoneal gemcitabine a
t 6 h between icodextrin and isotonic sodium chloride solution (P=0.01) and
between hetastarch and isotonic sodium chloride solution (P = 0.05). There
were no significant differences in plasma 5-fluorouracil and plasma gemcit
abine concentrations obtained with the five solutions. Conclusions: These f
indings show that the clearance of 5-fluorouracil and gemcitabine from the
peritoneal cavity can be significantly modified by varying the tonicity or
the molecular weight of the carrier solution. Peritoneal fluid clearance wa
s slower with hypertonic sodium chloride and high molecular weight solution
s and this resulted in a reduced clearance of chemotherapy.
By using a high molecular weight carrier solution the exposure of intraperi
toneal cancer cells to gemcitabine was prolonged and drug availability at t
he peritoneal surface was increased. Similarly, by using a hypertonic carri
er solution the exposure to 5-fluorouracil was prolonged and drug availabil
ity at the peritoneal surface was also increased.