Constrictive pericarditis is a uncommom disease in children. We have now en
countered pericardial thickening as the cause of severe constrictive physio
logy in two patients, one also having haemodynamic features of restrictive
cardiomyopathy. Both patients, who had refractory ascites and evidence of i
ncreased systemic venous pressure, underwent Doppler echocardiography, card
iac catheterisation, and magnetic resonance imaging. Resonance imaging fail
ed to show any thickning of the pericardium, but cardiac catheterisation re
vealed diastolic equalisation of pressures in all four chambers, with only
mild elevation of pulmonary pressure in the first patient, but nearly equal
isation of diastolic pressure, and a very high pulmonary arterial pressure
with a difference of 7 mm Hg between the end diastolic pressures in the two
ventricles in the second patient. Doppler revealed a restrictive pattern o
f mitral inflow, with high E and small A velocities and a short deceleratio
n time. The clinical background did not suggest pericardial disease in eith
er of the patients. We conclude that a careful search is needed to uncover
constrictive pericarditis when there is no previous disease which may sugge
st late pericardial constriction. The haemodynamic features of restrictive
cardiomyopathy can co-exist with pericardial restriction, and differentiati
on between the two entities is critical in view of the diverse management a
nd prognosis of the two conditions.