Comparison of the effect of verapamil and propranolol on response of coronary vasomotion to cold pressor test in symptomatic patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Pp. Dimitrow et al., Comparison of the effect of verapamil and propranolol on response of coronary vasomotion to cold pressor test in symptomatic patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, CARDIO DRUG, 14(6), 2000, pp. 643-650
Citations number
54
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilatation of coronary resistance vessel
s has been demonstrated in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HC).
The aim of this study was to compare the effect of verapamil and propranolo
l on the response of diastolic coronary blood flow velocity (CBFV) and coro
nary vascular resistance index to the cold presser test (CPT) in symptomati
c HC patients. In 15 patients with HC, the CBFV was measured in the distal
portion of the left anterior descending coronary artery using high-sensitiv
ity transthoracic Doppler echocardiography. Peak diastolic CBFV and coronar
y vascular resistance index (calculated as ratio of mean aortic pressure/CB
FV ratio) were measured at baseline and after CPT Changes of these paramete
rs induced by the CPT (expressed as percentage of baseline values) mere com
pared after verapamil and propranolol treatment in a crossover study. The s
ame measurements were obtained in nine healthy control subjects. CPT induce
d an increasing pattern of CBFV during verapamil therapy, which was absent
in CPT after propranolol administration (10.1 +/- 5.6% vs. -0.9 +/- 4.1%, P
< 0.01). In healthy controls CBFV increased in response to CPT more than i
n HC patients receiving verapamil or propranolol (23.1 +/- 12.8% P < 0.01 a
nd P < 0.05, respectively). The coronary vascular resistance index increase
d during the CPT significantly less on verapamil than on propranolol treatm
ent (3.5 +/- 9.2% vs. 18.1 +/- 13.5%, P < 0.01). In healthy controls the co
ronary vascular resistance index decreased during CPT -4.5 +/- 8.5% (P < 0.
05 vs. verapamil and P < 0.01 vs. propranolol). Verapamil improved the coro
nary vasomotor response to CPT in relation to propranolol. Verapamil blunte
d the increase of the coronary vascular resistance index to the CPT in comp
arison with its change at CPT after propranolol. Thus, coronary endothelial
dysfunction in symptomatic HC patients may be partially reduced by verapam
il in comparison with propranolol treatment.