Endorectal ultrasound in rectal epithelial tumors. Role in differentiated therapy

Citation
C. Langer et al., Endorectal ultrasound in rectal epithelial tumors. Role in differentiated therapy, CHIRURG, 72(3), 2001, pp. 266-271
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
CHIRURG
ISSN journal
00094722 → ACNP
Volume
72
Issue
3
Year of publication
2001
Pages
266 - 271
Database
ISI
SICI code
0009-4722(200103)72:3<266:EUIRET>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
Introduction: Endorectal ultrasound (EU) is the most important examination for pretherapeutic stratification of primary rectal tumors. Preoperative hi stology and endosonography determine the therapeutic strategy by using the criteria of depth of infiltration (uT) and lymph node status (uN). Methods: The effectiveness of endoluminal ultrasound in the preoperative differenti ation between locally restricted tumors (adenomas and "low-risk" carcinomas , uT0/1, G1-2) and advanced rectal carcinomas (uT3) was assessed in a retro spective study of 284 patients. In the examination period (UZ) from 3/94 to 12/97 (UZ I) 104 patients (group 1) were examined with a 7-MHz endoprobe, and from 1/98 to 12/99 (UZ II), 116 (group 2) with a 10-MHz endoprobe. Addi tionally, in 64 patients (group 3) with an advanced uT3/4 or uN + tumor we compared the accuracy of ultrasound with computed tomography (CT). In this group 32 patients were restaged by EU and CT after preoperative chemoradiat ion. The results of preoperative endorectal ultrasound were correlated with the postoperative histological data. Results: Concerning the whole period (UZ I and II) we achieved a total hit rate of 83.6% for adenomas and "low-r isk" carcinomas (uT0/1, G1/2) by EU (79.8 % in UZ I, 87.1 % in UZ II). For advanced rectal carcinoma (2 uT3) we found a total accuracy of 87.3% (82.7 % in UZ I, 91.4% in UZ II). In 62 cases endosonographic lymph node status w as correlated with postoperative histology during UZ II, with a hit rate of 64.5%. In group 3 (n = 64), in 32 patients without preoperative chemoradia tion we found an accuracy for depth infiltration of 93% (EU) and 82 % (CT). Concerning lymph node status there was a correlation of 57% (EU) and 64% ( CT). After preoperative chemoradiation (n = 32) we found an accuracy of 91 % (EU) and 73% (CT) for depth infiltration - for lymph node status 70% (EU) and 82% (CT). Conclusions: High accuracy in endoluminal ultrasound leads t o a secure and differentiated stratification of therapy in primary rectal t umors. The hit rate concerning depth of infiltration is higher for EU than for CT both before and after chemoradiation, but not regarding lymph node s tatus.