Objective: To evaluate digoxin pharmacokinetic parameters using Bayesian es
timation in 60 patients, and to identify factors that appeared to affect th
e risk of digoxin toxicity.
Patients and Methods: 60 patients with serum digoxin concentrations were ev
aluated retrospectively. We collected demographic, clinical and laboratory
data, and information on concurrent medications and clinical and electrocar
diographic features of digoxin toxicity. The incidence of digoxin toxicity
was evaluated in 50 patients. Serum digoxin concentrations were measured wi
th fluorescence polarisation immunoassay. Individual pharmacokinetic parame
ters were estimated by Bayesian method using Abbottbase Pharmacokinetic Sys
tems.
Results: Signs of digoxin toxicity were present in 23 patients (46%). Patie
nts without signs of digoxin toxicity had a significantly lower mean serum
digoxin concentration than patients with signs, 1.99 +/- 0.9 mug/L vs 2.7 /- 1.5 mug/L, respectively (p = 0.047). Patients with serum digoxin concent
rations >2.2 mug/L differed significantly from those with values 12.2 mug/L
, respectively, for the following parameters: age (82.0 +/- 8.0 vs 72.0 +/-
16.0 years; p = 0.005), serum creatinine levels (133.0 +/- 55.0 vs 106.0 /- 26.0 mu mol/L; p = 0.012), bodyweight (57.4 +/- 12.8 vs 69.2 +/- 17.8kg;
p = 0.01), volume of distribution (208.5 +/- 89.5 vs 315.7 +/- 91.21,; p =
0.0001), total clearance (1.60 +/- ,0.65 vs 3.4 +/- 1.5 L/h; p = 0.0001),
and elimination half-life (94.2 +/- 28.6 vs 72.4 +/- 16.7h; p = 0.001). Est
imation of optimal dose showed that the doses recommended in intoxicated pa
tients should be 3.5 times lower to reach the therapeutic range.
Conclusion: Digoxin concentrations were higher in patients with toxicity. O
lder age enhanced the risk of digoxin toxicity. Monitoring digoxin concentr
ations may help to confirm suspected digitalis toxicity.