E. Fuseau et al., Effect of encapsulation on absorption of sumatriptan tablets: Data from healthy volunteers and patients during a migraine, CLIN THER, 23(2), 2001, pp. 242-251
Background: Some comparative trials of selective serotonin 1B/1D-agonists i
n migraine have reported similar to 15% lower efficacy for sumatriptan tabl
ets than that reported in placebo-controlled trials.
Objective: This study was designed to test the hypothesis that the encapsul
ation methods used to mask active drug may delay absorption of sumatriptan
from dosing to 2 hours after dosing (the traditional end point in clinical
trials of migraine treatment), an effect that may be enhanced by migraine-a
ssociated gastric stasis.
Methods: Two randomized, open-label, 2-way crossover trials were conducted
to evaluate the absorption and bioequivalence of conventional 50-mg sumatri
ptan tablets and encapsulated 50-mg sumatriptan tablets in supine, fasted,
healthy volunteers (Glaxo Wellcome protocol SUM40270) and supine patients e
xperiencing a migraine (Glaxo Wellcome protocol SUM40268). Absorption was a
ssessed by calculating the area under the plasma concentration-time curve f
rom dosing to 2 hours after dosing (AUC(2)) and the times to first measurab
le plasma concentration, 10 ng/mL, 20 ng/mL, and maximum plasma concentrati
on. Data for the AUC from time zero to infinity and maximum plasma concentr
ation were used to assess standard bioequivalence, which is considered to o
ccur when the 90% CIs for the geometric mean treatment ratios (test/referen
ce) fall between 0.8 and 1.25.
Results: Study 1 included 26 healthy subjects (73% men, 27% women; mean age
, 39.1 years), and study 2 included 30 patients with migraine (67% women, 3
3% men; mean age, 42.7 years). Sumatriptan absorption was delayed with the
encapsulated tablet compared with the conventional tablet 0 to 2 hours afte
r dosing, particularly during a migraine. AUG, values with encapsulated sum
atriptan compared with the conventional tablet were 21% lower in healthy vo
lunteers (ratio of capsule/ tablet, 0.79, 90% CI, 0.588-1.050) and 27% lowe
r in patients experiencing a migraine (ratio of capsule/tablet, 0.73; 90% C
I, 0.519-1.023). Standard bioequivalence was demonstrated in both healthy v
olunteers and patients experiencing a migraine.
Conclusions: Encapsulation delayed absorption of sumatriptan 0 to 2 hours a
fter dosing, particularly during a migraine. This delay in absorption of th
e encapsulated form may account for the lower efficacy of sumatriptan in so
me comparative studies.