C. Byhahn et al., Occupational exposure to volatile anaesthetics - Epidemiology and approaches to reducing the problem, CNS DRUGS, 15(3), 2001, pp. 197-215
Long term occupational exposure to trace concentrations of volatile anaesth
etics is thought to have adverse effects on the health of exposed personnel
. In contrast with halothane - an agent likely to cause mutagenic effects a
nd proven to be teratogenic - isoflurane and enflurane have not so far been
proved to have adverse effects on the health of personnel exposed long ter
m. Data on the newer agents sevoflurane and desflurane are limited. Since p
ossible health hazards from long term exposure to inhalational anaesthetics
cannot yet be definitively excluded, many Western countries have establish
ed limits for exposure. These usually range from 2 to 10 ppm as a time-weig
hted average over the time of exposure.
A number of investigations have demonstrated that, in operating theatres wi
th modern climate control and waste anaesthetic gas scavenging systems, occ
upational exposure is unlikely to exceed threshold limits. However, occupat
ional exposure from the use of volatile agents in operating theatres with p
oor air control - especially during bronchoscopy procedures in paediatric p
atients - remains a source of concern. This also holds true for both postan
aesthesia care units (PACU) and intensive care units (ICU) lacking proper a
ir conditioning and waste gas scavengers.
To minimise occupational exposure to volatile anaesthetics, all measures mu
st be taken to provide climate control and properly working scavenging devi
ces, and ensure sufficient personal skill of the anaesthetist, e.g. during
inhalational mask induction. Furthermore, low-flow anaesthesia should be us
ed whenever possible. The sole use of intravenous drugs such as propofol in
stead of volatile agents, were this possible, would eliminate occupational
exposure, but may result in environmental pollution by toxic metabolites (e
.g. phenol).