Growing up in a higher socioeconomic status neighborhood and attending scho
ol with socioeconomically advantaged classmates is associated with better a
cademic, social, and labor market outcomes. The extent to which this associ
ation reflects a causal relationship is much debated, and the conclusions r
eached often depend upon the estimation method used to account for the endo
geneity of school and neighborhood choice. This paper uses a sample of stud
ents from the High School and Beyond Longitudinal Survey to examine whether
the use of aggregate county and metropolitan area level data as instrument
s for school peer group background ameliorates the problem of endogeneity b
ias. The pattern of estimates does not support the belief that aggregation
reduces specification error in the estimation of peer group effects. (C) 20
01 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.