Background and objective Intravenous morphine titration is used to obtain p
ostoperative pain relief, but few studies have assessed the appropriate reg
imen. in a quality programme, we performed a prospective non-randomized stu
dy of morphine titration in a postanaesthesia care unit (PACU).
Methods Four regimens of morphine titration were studied: every 10 (group 1
, n=400) or 5 min (group 2, n=400) with a maximum of five intravenous bolus
es; every 5 min, without any limitation in the number of boluses (groups 3
and 4, n=400 each); in groups 1, 2, and 3, subcutaneous morphine was admini
stered 4 h after titration. In group 4, administration of subcutaneous morp
hine was allowed only 2 h after titration. A visual analogue pain scale (VA
PS) > 30 mm was required to administer morphine and pain relief was defined
as a VAPS less than or equal to 30 mm.
Results After morphine titration, VAPS was lower and the number of patients
with pain relief was greater in patients from groups 3 and 4. Patients fro
m group 4 had the lowest VAPS (26+/-17 mm) and the highest percentage of pa
in relief (73%) at the end of the PACU period. The number of sedated patien
ts increased in groups 3 (62%) and 4 (61%) compared with group 1 (27%). No
significant differences in morphine-related adverse effects were observed.
Conclusion Intravenous morphine titration every 5 min with an unlimited num
ber of boluses and early subcutaneous administration provided the best anal
gesic regimen.