K. Holcomb et al., (60)Cobalt vs. linear accelerator in the treatment of locally advanced cervix carcinoma: a comparison of survival and recurrence patterns, EUR J GYN O, 22(1), 2001, pp. 16-19
Objective: To compare the survival and recurrence patterns of patients with
locally advanced cervical carcinoma treated with (60)cobalt radiotherapy u
nits and linear accelerators.
Methods: Two hundred and forty-eight patients with cervical carcinoma stage
s IIB-IVA who were treated with primary irradiation between the: years 1985
and 1988 comprised the study group. The median survival of patients treate
d with (60)cobalt units and linear accelerators was calculated using the me
thod of Kaplan and Meier and compared using the log-rank test. Recurrence p
atterns were compared using chi-square analysis: p < .05 was considered sig
nificant for all tests.
Results: One hundred and ninety-five patients were treated with (60)cobalt
units (Group 1) and 53 patients were treated with a linear accelerator (Gro
up 2). Group 1 and 2 were similar with regard to mean age and weight, stage
distribution, and mean dose to point A. The rate of recurrence wits compar
able between Group 1 and 2 (65.6% vs. 64.2%) and no significant difference
was found in overall survival between the groups (20 months vs. 21 months.
p = 81). There was a trend toward increasing pelvic recurrence in Group 1 (
50.8%) compared to Group 2 (35.8%. p = .08).
Conclusions: (60)Cobalt units and linear accelerators offer comparable rate
s of overall survival in patients with locally advanced cervix carcinoma.