G. Schmalisch et al., In vitro assessment of equipment and software to assess tidal breathing parameters in infants, EUR RESP J, 17(1), 2001, pp. 100-107
The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the measurement accuracy of t
wo currently available devices for measuring tidal breathing in infants, A
mechanical model pump was used to generate flow profiles which simulated th
ose observed in infants. A range of flows was applied simultaneously to two
different devices, namely the commercially available SensorMedics 2600 (SM
2600) and more recently developed, custom-made equipment based on the flow
-through technique (FTT), Automatically derived values from both devices we
re compared with one another and with manual calculations of printouts of t
he same breaths.
There were no differences in the raw flow signal obtained from the two devi
ces, nor between values calculated automatically or manually from the FTT,
Similarly, the deviations between the FTT and SM 2600,were <3% for tidal vo
lume, respiratory frequency and minute ventilation. However, when comparing
either with manually calculated values or those derived automatically from
the FTT, there was a systematic and highly significant underestimation of
shape-dependent parameters, such as the time to peak tidal expiratory from
as a proportion of tidal expiratory time (tPTEF/tE), derived by the SM 2600
, The lower the applied flow, the higher the observed deviations, the under
estimation being up to 60% when flows simulating those observed in preterm
neonates,were applied,
These errors appear to result from differences in signal processing such as
the algorithms used for breath detection and can only be detected if appro
priate nonsinusoidal flow profiles representing those seen in infants are u
sed to evaluate equipment.