In presenting the case of SS guard Hanna Schmitz from the perspective of he
r young lover, Bernhard Schlink's award-winning Der Vorleser would seem to
represent that cutting edge of Holocaust literature interested in depicting
per-petrators in a more nuanced fashion. However, this gesture toward comp
lexity a welcome trend in itself is not ultimately supported by the text, w
hich insistently obscures Hanna's role in a series of crimes against humani
ty. The likeable narrator's attempt to come to terms with the Holocaust, wh
ich is espoused as exemp-lary, proves in the end to rely on a problematic c
onception of dual victimisation: of Hanna as victim of circumstance, and of
himself as victim of Hanna. This essay draws liberally upon reception data
in order to discover the manner in which the novel exploits a number of en
trenched assumptions on the part of readers. Chief among these are 1) the d
iffuse sense that confronting the Holocaust presents a demanding burden, re
ndering present day observers as victims of a sort; and 2) the presuppositi
on that moral sophistication an attribute with which Der Vorleser has been
frequently credited is tantamount to indecision or undecidability. The real
'limits' to Holocaust fiction are thus found to inhere within both the cri
tical climate and the unfulfilled ambitions of the novel.